|
|
|
 |
| ||
And ye shall know the truth,
|
In GEOCENTRIC COSMOLOGY, the World does not rotate.
In HELIOCENTRIC COSMOLOGY, the World rotates at a speed that varies with latitude, yet this is supposedly indiscernible.
In GEOCENTRIC COSMOLOGY, the World does not orbit the Sun.
Hence, in GEOCENTRIC COSMOLOGY, the motions we see are real.
In HELIOCENTRIC COSMOLOGY, the World is traveling at 25x the speed of a rifle bullet, yet this is supposedly indiscernible.
Hence, in HELIOCENTRIC COSMOLOGY, the motions we sense are unreal and those that are real we cannot sense.
NEW - Purchase for a special price of $14 (US) (£7 UK) a digital download version of the leading Geocentric computer model in the world, and receive it immediately. Requires a broadband connection since the file is about forty megabytes. Discover for yourself the kinematics involved in an Earth-centric cosmos, where we are both the centre of God's attention and affection. Check it all out at the shop:
Our objective is to unravel the threads of truth and reality from those of lies and deception with which they have been intricately intertwined in the fabric of mankind's "knowledge" throughout the ages. Science is just as susceptible to this problem as any other discipline, so it is important to realize that in this quest we must not blindly follow whatever is the popular scientific belief of the day.
Paradigms come and go. Physics, in particular, needs to be freed from the absurdities of theoretical mathematics, a mental mirage which has produced nothing of any value. For, "in the language of mathematics we can tell lies as well as truths, and within the scope of mathematics itself there is no possible way of telling one from the other" - Prof. H. Dingle, D.Sc., 1972, "Science at the Crossroads," p. 33.
The following quotation, taken from Germar Rudolph's website, further highlights a disturbing modern trend, "Natural sciences [and other disciplines as well] are an extremely conservative and dogmatic matter. Any corroboration of a paradigm is welcome, whereas any innovation or revision will long meet with resistance; the instinct for preservation (including self-preservation!) is stronger than the search for truth. Therefore, new findings usually gain acceptance only when sufficient numbers of researchers stand up for them: then the dogmatic status quo topples, a 'scientific revolution' occurs, a new paradigm replaces the old ... The bottom line is that no student, no researcher and no layman should believe any facts to be 'conclusively proven', even if the textbooks present them as such...." - Prof. Walter Nagl, Ph.D., Gentechnologie und Grenzen der Biologie, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt 1987, p. 126f.
If you are unable to view the menus located at the top of this page then please click Site Map.
Questions or comments to: steven@geocentricperspective.com
